Viriditas ( talk) 07:22, 22 December 2014 (UTC) What is it you want me to do, Viriditas? - Ssven2 speak 2 me 07:30, 22 December 2014 (UTC) If I visited any of those links and was brought here instead, I would wonder why the title was different. Did the film have several different titles (a primary and an alternate, in most cases)? Can you explain why this is the case? In other words, why does the article currently sit at this title rather than the other? If it is, should the article make a note of it? A footnote to explain the use of both titles would work and is generally best practice if a film uses multiple titles. Kailash29792 ( talk) 07:16, 22 December 2014 (UTC) I'm still trying to figure this out. Ssven2 speak 2 me 06:25, 22 December 2014 (UTC) I think this is already fine as it is, because 23m redirects to this article now, and anything linking to that actually links to this. But, both are correct and signify the same translation ie meaning. Many newspapers named the films as either one of the two versions. Surely, these should be fixed if this is the correct title? Why are there two different titles? Viriditas ( talk) 05:53, 22 December 2014 (UTC) Any idea why there were two different versions for so many years? There are still quite a number of articles that link to the duplicate (but alternately named topic).
IMSAI ARASAN 23AM PULIKESI 2006 FILM FREE
(also got query as to whether image is rightfully uploaded as CC-BY-SA.) LS1979 ( talk) 12:38, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Refactored above comment, because I removed the image from the talk page because it's not free content. I'll put it back if it's permitted, but I think it's tangential at best to the actual article. Taken out this image, pending a review of the MOS, because I'm not sure it fits with the context of the film.
0 kommentar(er)
